Legal Opinion · Dissent

Berrie v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 2, 1934No. A-8567Published

1DissentChappell, J.

I cannot agree with the majority opinion in this case, because to sustain a conviction the state must prove: First, that Mrs. Berrie,died of strychnine poisoning; second, that defendant administered the poison himself or procured it to be done by another.

To sustain the state’s contention that Mrs. Berrie died of strychnine poisoning, it called Dr. W. W. Bailey, who testified on direct examination that he found a small amount of strychnine in the liver, spleen, stomach, and contents, but not sufficient to measure the quantity, and detailed the symptoms of strychnine poisoning. As to the cause…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. State v. BlydenburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Sies v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API