Legal Opinion

Clark's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1931No. Appeal, 46PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Appellant, who is the widow of testator, elected to take against his will. The court below struck off the election, because of an antenuptial agreement entered into by the parties on the day of their marriage. This agreement was held valid, and, from the decree of distribution made in accordance with its terms, the present appeal was taken.

The agreement provides that each of the parties to it “shall have, hold and possess only such property rights as are created and agreed upon under this antenuptial settlement; that is to say” if he dies first she “shall inherit…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Phillips's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Appeal of NeelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Warner's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Bierer's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  5. Tiernan v. BinnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. McClellan EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Brooks v. ConstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Kaufmann EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Blue Ridge Metal Manufacturing Co. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Emery EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API