Berry v. Haldeman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by Joseph H. Berry and Thomas Berry against Walter N. Haldeman for the breach of a contract for the sale and delivery of goods. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Litigation growing out of nearly the same facts as in this case was had in the case of Haldeman v. Berry, 74 Mich. 424. A reference to that case will make it unnecessary to repeat all the facts appearing in the record in this case. After that case was decided against Berry et al., they brought this suit to recover the damages which they attempted to recover in that proceeding by way of recoupment. The contract which was entered into by the parties was made, if made at all, by J. H. Mason acting for Berry et al., and by Collins acting for Haldeman. The facts necessary to an understanding of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Foster v. RockwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Falley v. GilesIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Hopwood v. CorbinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Carson v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.