Legal Opinion

Iddings v. Mee-Lee

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1996No. 17877Published

1Opinion of the Court

919 P.2d 263 (1996)

82 Hawai`i 1

Barbara IDDINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Dennis MEE-LEE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17877.

Supreme Court of Hawai`i.

June 20, 1996.

Francis T. O'Brien of Ashford & Nakamura, on the briefs, Honolulu, for plaintiff-appellant Barbara Iddings.

Richard K. Quinn and Timothy I. MacMaster, on the briefs, Honolulu, for defendant-appellee Dennis Mee-Lee, M.D.

Before MOON, C.J., and KLEIN, LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA and RAMIL, JJ.

MOON, Chief Justice.

In this case, dealing with the scope and requirements of the statutory "wilful[[1]] and wanton misconduct" exception to the co-employee immunity…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API