Legal Opinion

In Re Dow Corning Corp.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 20, 1997No. 19-42959PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON COURT’S AUTHORITY TO DECIDE DOW CORNING CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ITS OMNIBUS DISEASE OBJECTION TO BREAST IMPLANT CLAIMS

ARTHUR J. SPECTOR, Bankruptcy Judge.

Introduction

Since enactment of the 1984 amendments to the Bankruptcy Code and to title 28, there has been a general assumption that “bankruptcy courts do not have jurisdiction to decide personal injury tort claims.” In re Thomas, 211 B.R. 838, 840 (Bankr.D.S.C.1997). See also In re Barker-Fowler Elec. Co., 141 B.R. 929, 939 (Bankr.W.D.Mich.1992); Pettibone Corp. v. Easley, 935 F.2d 120, 123 (7th Cir.1991); In…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Tribune Media Company v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  4. Stranz v. Ice Cream Liquidation, Inc. (In Re Ice Cream Liquidation, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
  5. Flake v. Alper Holdings USA, Inc. (In Re Alper Holdings USA, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API