Legal Opinion

Everly v. Black Hills United Mining Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1934No. File No. 7707PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

The plaintiffs are five in number, and bring this single action to rescind certain sales of stock made by the defendants to the plaintiffs and to recover the purchase price paid. By their amended complaint the plaintiffs allege that the defendant Black Bills United Mining Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of this state; that the individual defendants are all directors of the mining company and control the majority interest of the capital stock; that the defendants, their agents and servants, issued a prospectus for the purpose of inducing the general public to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reardon v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Bosher v. R. & H. Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1892
  3. Hamilton v. American Hulled Bean Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Northern Finance Corp. v. Midwest Comm. Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Simonson v. Farmers ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API