Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Lawrence County; Hon. Wimjam G. Rice, Judge. Action by Burt Rogers and others against the Penobscot Mining Company and others. From a judgment for one plaintiff, defendant named and. another take separate appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, J.
Originally, at the time this suit was instituted, Burt Rogei's, Sol Rosenthal, J. G. Thomas, R. M. Maloney, R. T. Babuey were the only plaintiffs. Subsequently, by amendment, Frank R. Byrns and the United States Mines Company became plaintiffs. After being twice amended, the complaint on which this action was tried was substantially as follows: That in 1902 Frank R. Byrns and the defendant Maitland entered into a contract whereby it was agreed that Byrns should secure in the name of and with the money of Maitland certain mining properties situated in Lawrence county; that a mining corporation…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bankers Life Insurance v. RobbinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Nicholes v. People ex rel. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Deming Investment Co. v. ElyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Fisher, Sons & Co. v. CrowleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Northwestern Port Huron Co. v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Federal Land Bk. of St. Louis v. GladishSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Bates v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Clem Oil Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Read v. RouschSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Rossi v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.