Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ford v. Caulfield

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 10, 2009No. Civil Action 07-1182 (CKK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Kevin Charles Ford, Sr., filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus while confined in the Central Treatment Facility in the District of Columbia. Subsequently, counsel entered an appearance for Ford and filed two amended petitions. Ford has since been released from confinement, but his challenge to the United States Parole Commission’s continuing jurisdic tion over him survives. The federal respondents urge the Court to summarily deny the petition. Because the record establishes that Ford’s Superior Court sentence expired…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ford v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Al Saud 108844 v. LambDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  3. In re: Maryetta C. MarksUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Jackson v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Jackson v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API