Legal Opinion
Continental Casualty Company v. Lana J. Rose
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 14, 1969No. 10151PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
This diversity suit was brought in the District Court for the District of Colorado to recover the proceeds of an accident insurance policy insuring, among other risks, against the loss of the sight of both eyes of the insured. Recovery was allowed and this appeal followed.
The now deceased insured, who was the husband of appellee, on October 15, 1965, purchased the accident insurance policy from appellant company. The policy provided for payment of the sum of $10,000 in the event of the loss of “sight in both eyes” resulting from injury to the insured if such loss of sight…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Corporation v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Carl B. Sebring, State Bank Commissioner of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Skinner v. ParnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Hill v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by5 opinions
- Butler Paper Company v. Business Forms, Ltd., and Maneke-Kinzie Printing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Ware v. Royal Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. S.E.K. Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. S. E. K. Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- William Edward Ware, and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Third-Party v. Royal Indemnity Corporation, a Foreign Corporation, and Hertz Corporation, Aforeign Corporation, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Third-Party v. Royal Indemnity Corporation, a Foreign Corporation, and Hertz Corporation, Aforeign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969