Legal Opinion

Ware v. Royal Indemnity Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1969No. Nos. 22-68, 23-68PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKEY, Circuit Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment action wherein appellant Ware, a judgment debtor on a liability claim, sued Royal Indemnity Corporation, which was the liability insurance carrier for Hertz Car Rental Corporation. Hertz was the owner of the vehicle Ware was driving at the time of the accident which resulted in his liability.

Royal Indemnity Corporation brought in, as third party defendants, appellant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, which insured Ware individually, and appellant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, which insured Ware’s employer, Honeywell, Inc.

Agreed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oil Daily, Inc., a Corporation v. Chester L. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Continental Casualty Company v. Lana J. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. Minamayor Corp. v. Paper Mill Suppliers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. BodyDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1983
  2. William Edward Ware, and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Third-Party v. Royal Indemnity Corporation, a Foreign Corporation, and Hertz Corporation, Aforeign Corporation, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Third-Party v. Royal Indemnity Corporation, a Foreign Corporation, and Hertz Corporation, Aforeign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API