Legal Opinion

In re Ross Township Election District Reapportionment

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1985No. Appeal, No. 521 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

A group of electors from Eoss Township appeals a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, which accepted the report of a reapportionment commission and thereby reapportioned Eoss Township from nine to seven wards. The issue for our determination is whether the trial court erred in its earlier order setting aside the township’s first reapportionment plan.

The complex history of the case began when the township adopted, on December 27, 1982, a reapportionment plan which two township commissioners serving as a reapportionment committee had prepared; that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erfer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Varner, J. v. Swatara Township, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API