Huber v. Moran-Greenberg Corp.
New York County Courts
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The judgment debtor moves for reargument of contempt motions in both of the above-entitled supplementary proceedings. The alleged contempt consists of non-appearance pursuant to order, upon an adjourned date. The contempt applications have no basis unless the judge who signed the order for the examination of the judgment debtors had jurisdiction of the supplementary proceedings. If he had no jurisdiction, then his orders were null, and the judgment debtors had a right to disregard them. Both proceedings were based upon the return, unsatisfied, of executions issued to a city marshal, upon…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Rosen v. PolanskyNew York Supreme Court · 1923
- R. M. Hollingshead Co. v. SantilloNew York Supreme Court · 1923
- Merchants Credit Service, Inc. v. Chouteau County BankMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Merchants Credit Service, Inc. v. Chouteau County BankMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Solomon v. Suffin, New York County Courts1925