Legal Opinion

Rosen v. Polansky

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to punish third party for contempt.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

Upon this motion to punish a third party for contempt for failing to appear on the adjourned day for examination the jurisdiction of this court to entertain the proceeding is challenged. The papers show the obtaining of a judgment in the Municipal Court in the borough of Manhattan, the issuance of an execution thereon to the marshal of the city of New York and its return unsatisfied. There is nothing to show that any execution was issued to the sheriff or that any transcript of the judgment has been filed in Kings county. Because there was no such execution issued or transcript filed the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Importers & Traders' National Bank v. QuackenbushNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Hottenroth v. FlahertyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
  3. Huber v. Moran-Greenberg Corp., New York County Courts1922
  4. In re Proceedings Supplementary to Execution under a Judgment in an ActionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  5. Regina Cloak & Suit Corp. v. ZalmovitzNew York Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Corn Exchange Bank v. HirschbergNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hecht v. SangerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API