Legal Opinion

R. M. Hollingshead Co. v. Santillo

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to punish judgment debtor in supplementary proceedings for contempt.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

Supplementary proceedings were instituted before a justice of this court upon a judgment rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York. The judgment had not been docketed in the office of the county clerk of Kings county, nor execution issued to the sheriff of said county, in which county it was alleged that the judgment debtor resided; but it appeared that execution had been issued to a city marshal and returned unsatisfied. By a new subdivision added to section 775 of the Civil Practice Act by chapter 550 of the Laws of 1922, and designated as subdivision 4, a judgment creditor is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huber v. Moran-Greenberg Corp., New York County Courts1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Corn Exchange Bank v. HirschbergNew York Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API