Legal Opinion
People v. Bundesen
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1980No. Crim. 18807PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
This appeal, pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5, subdivision (m), is from a judgment entered after defendant and appellant Rocky Bundesen’s motion to suppress evidence was denied and he pled guilty to violations of Health and Safety Code section 11350 (possession of heroin) and Business and Professions Code section 4143 (possession of a hypodermic needle or syringe).
During the early evening hours of May 26, 1978, San Jose Police Officers Giillim and Hafley were watching a house where they believed heroin sales were taking place. The officers were members of a special…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- People v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. Arturo D.California Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. DillonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. DeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.