Legal Opinion
China Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 26, 2004No. SLIP OP. 04-6; 01-01040PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POGUE, Judge.
This is a review of the Department of Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermi-nation Pursuant to Court Remand, Cer tain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Taiwan (Aug. 14, 2003) (“Remand Determ.” or “Remand Determ ination”). 2 The Department’s Remand Determination followed the Court’s decision in China Steel Corp. v. United States, 27 CIT -, 264 F.Supp.2d 1339 (2003) (“CSC/YL I”) 3 (remanding aspects of Commerce’s final affirmative antidumping duty determination in Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Taiwan, 66 Fed.Reg. 49,618 (Dep’t Commerce Sept. 28,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tianjin MacHinery Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Peer Bearing Co. Changshan v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- AK Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.