Legal Opinion

Clinicomp International, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 1, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00188PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Post-Award Bid Protest; Waiver of Plaintiff’s Challenge to the Solicitation’s Terms; Disparate Treatment of Offerors in Evaluation of Quotations.

OPINION AND ORDER

BUSH, Senior Judge.

This post-award bid protest arises out of Request for Quotations (RFQ) No. VA249-13-Q-1015, by which the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) sought, by means of a lowest price technically acceptable procurement conducted pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.101-2, 2 to procure a computer information system for the intensive care units of various VA medical centers in Kentucky,…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Springfield Parcel C, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Draken International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Palantir Technologies Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Visual Connections, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API