Legal Opinion
State v. Diaz-Rey
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 2, 2013No. ED 98848PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Presiding Judge.
The circuit court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the information charging defendant with forgery in violation of section 570.090 RSMo (2000),1 based on the use of a false social security number on an employment document, on the ground that the prosecution was preempted by the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324a. We reverse the circuit court’s dismissal of the information, and we reinstate the charge for further proceedings.
The state filed an information charging defendant, Pablo Gilberto Diaz-Rey, with a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Robert MetzingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. MoralesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Amended August 15, 2017 State of Iowa v. Martha Aracely MartinezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Amended June 16, 2017 State of Iowa v. Martha Aracely MartinezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Collector of Winchester, Missouri, and City of Winchester, Missouri v. Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications, LLC, and Charter Fiberlink-Missouri, LLC, and Charter Advanced Services (MO), LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.