Legal Opinion
In Re Gailliard
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 2008No. 06-BG-1439, 06-BG-1440PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation of the Board of Professional Responsibility (the Board) that respondent, already suspended from the Bar in South Carolina, be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for three years as a consequence of his conviction in South Carolina of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN). Further, the Board recommends that respondent be eligible for readmission only after a showing of fitness to resume the practice of law. We accept the Board’s recommendation.
This disciplinary matter is here…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- In Re NovickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re JacobyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re WeaverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re UscinskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re UscinskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010