Legal Opinion
In Re Novick
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 23, 1993No. 90-SP-93, 90-SP-927PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter is before the court on the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) that respondent be disbarred, effective nunc pro tunc as of July 28, 1989, as a consequence of his conviction for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, making a false statement in connection with a Department of Housing and Urban Development transaction. While this matter was pending before the Board, respondent filed a Motion to Consent to Disbarment in this court. Bar Counsel has filed a memorandum in support of that motion. Respondent concedes that if he is disbarred by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re GailliardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re UscinskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re SimonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re UscinskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In re EzrinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997