Legal Opinion
Jones v. Brilar Enterprises, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 5, 1992No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Amended judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: By failing timely to object, defendant failed to preserve its contention that the court erred in allowing references to defendant’s insurance company during the examination of defense witnesses (see, CPLR 4017, 5501 [a] [3]; Horton v Smith, 51 NY2d 798). Similarly unavailing is defendant’s challenge to plaintiff’s references to defendant’s insurance coverage during summation. Prior to summations, the parties and the court agreed upon the extent to which counsel could comment on the relationship that certain defense witnesses had…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Horton v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Orlick v. Granit Hotel & Country ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Byrd v. Genesee HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reynolds v. BurgheziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Wilcox v. MorrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- LUCAS, JR., JESSE v. WEINER, D.D.S., ALANAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Petronic v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Jones v. Brilar Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.