Boyle v. Waters
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Brown, J. Case by Lillian Boyle against Dudley E. Waters and another, receivers of the Pere Marquette Railroad Company, and the Ann Arbor Railroad Company for personal injuries: On petition of Reuben Hatch and others, copartners as Hatch, McAllister & Raymond, to establish a lien for services. Judgment for petitioners. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
This litigation results from a controversy between Hatch, McAllister & Raymond, a firm of attorneys of Grand Rapids, Michigan, and their former client, Lillian Boyle, concerning their charges for services while they were under retainer and employed as her attorneys, for that portion of their work in the litigation which related to the bill of exceptions, briefing, and arguing her case in this court. The case is found reported under the title of Boyle v. Waters, in 199 Mich. 478. The principal suit arose out of a personal injury which Miss Boyle sustained upon the railroads of the defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Berthold v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Brown v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Coveney v. PattulloMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Boyle v. WatersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KorotkiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Hightower v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Rippey v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Colgrove v. GoodyearMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Myers v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.