Legal Opinion

Coveney v. Pattullo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1902No. Docket No. 30PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Berrien; Coolidge, J. . Bill by Joseph E. Coveney against James B. Pattullo to set aside a mortgage. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The bill of complaint in this cause was filed for the purpose of obtaining a decree canceling and declaring void a certain mortgage executed by complainant to defendant July 10, 1900, at Dawson, Yukon territory, on lands situate in Berrien county. The bill alleges that the mortgage was obtained by fraud, conspiracy, duress, and was without consideration. It is alleged that in the latter part of May, 1900, the complainant went to Dawson, in the territory of Yukon, and there met one Frank Phiscator, who had formerly lived in Berrien county; that complainant had a just cause of action for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howell v. RansomNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  2. Dickinson v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Brock v. BarnesNew York Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Merryman v. EulerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  5. Hitchings v. . Van BruntNew York Court of Appeals · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kukla v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Rippey v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Gillette v. Metzgar Register Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Boyle v. WatersMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Timm v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API