Legal Opinion
Maughan v. GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 11, 2006No. B183969PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION
Plaintiffs Mark G. Maughan and Brown Maughan, an accounting corporation, on behalf of themselves and the putative class, appeal from the judgment in favor of defendant Google Technology, Inc. (Google). Google filed a cross-appeal from the judgment "insofar as it establishes attorneys' fees and costs."
By letter, this court invited the parties to brief: (1) whether the order granting Google's motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute (Code Civ. Proc., §…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Nancy Lee Ferland v. Conrad Credit Corp., a California Corporation Gregg A. michel,ph.d., an Individual Does 1-20, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Christian Research Institute v. AlnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Premier Medical Management Systems, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Cabral v. MartinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ellis v. Toshiba America Information Systems., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.