Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crawford v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1998No. 1995-1926Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 105.] THE STATE EX REL. CRAWFORD, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO; RELIANCE ELECTRIC COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Crawford v. Indus. Comm.,

1998-Ohio-264.] Workers’ compensation—Industrial Commission not required to extend permanent total disability compensation after issuing an interlocutory award for a closed period—Where commission’s order is supported by “some evidence,” it does not represent an abuse of discretion and will not be disturbed in mandamus. (No. 95-1926—Submitted May 13,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ormet Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Draganic v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Toth v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Toth v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Yancey v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API