Lutz v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
I. Introduction
{¶ 1} The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, has certified the following question to this court pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 9.01: “Does Ohio follow the ‘at the well’ rule (which permits the *525deduction of post-production costs) or does it follow some version of the ‘marketable product’ rule (which limits the deduction of post-production costs under certain circumstances)?”
{¶ 2} Under Ohio law, an oil and gas lease is a contract that is subject to the traditional rules of contract construction. Because the rights and remedies of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Graham v. Drydock Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Skivolocki v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. St. Elizabeth Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Buell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties, L.L.C. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
3Cited by48 opinions
- Laskaris v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Fifth Third Early Access Cash Advance Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Alford v. Collins-McGregor Operating Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Zehentbauer Family Land, LP v. Chesapeake Exploration, L. L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Tera, L.L.C. v. Rice Drilling D, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
- Browne v. Artex Oil Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.