Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 2016No. 2015-0545PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

I. Introduction

{¶ 1} The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, has certified the following question to this court pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 9.01: “Does Ohio follow the ‘at the well’ rule (which permits the *525deduction of post-production costs) or does it follow some version of the ‘marketable product’ rule (which limits the deduction of post-production costs under certain circumstances)?”

{¶ 2} Under Ohio law, an oil and gas lease is a contract that is subject to the traditional rules of contract construction. Because the rights and remedies of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Graham v. Drydock Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Skivolocki v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. St. Elizabeth Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Buell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties, L.L.C. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Laskaris v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Fifth Third Early Access Cash Advance Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Alford v. Collins-McGregor Operating Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Zehentbauer Family Land, LP v. Chesapeake Exploration, L. L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. Tera, L.L.C. v. Rice Drilling D, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Browne v. Artex Oil Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API