Legal Opinion
Watson v. Consolidated Edison of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 26, 2009No. 08 CV 4436 (JSR)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
Plaintiffs James Watson, Joseph Avita-bile, Thomas McGlade, and Robert Shee-han bring suit, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, against defendants Consolidated Edison of New York and the Consolidated Edison Pension and Benefits Plan, alleging, in essence, that defendants fraudulently and in breach of their fiduciary duties reduced plaintiffs’ retirement benefits. In their Class Action Complaint (“Compl.”), plaintiffs asserted seven causes of action: (1) breach of fiduciary duty pursuant to ERISA § 404, 29 U.S.C. § 1104; (2) breach of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Korman v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Watson v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON OF NEW YORKDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Daus v. Janover LLC Cafeteria PlanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Duke v. Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Indira Kairam, MD v. West Side GI, LLC, Peter Distler, M.D., and Ricardo Pou, M.D.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.