Legal Opinion
United Chromium v. General Motors Corporation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 8, 1935No. 2284PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
This is the usual bill in equity charging the defendants with infringement of letters patent No. 1,581,188 issued to Colin G. Fink on April 20, 1926, on an application filed December 19, 1925. The patent is for a “Process of Electro-Depositing Chromium and of Preparing Baths Therefor.” By various mesne assignments, title to the patent in suit is now vested in the plaintiff,
The proofs show that two of the defendants, viz., the New Departure Manufacturing Company and the Bassick Company, have factories within the district of Connecticut, where they had carried on the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Williams Bros. Well Treating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Ferdinand Gutmann & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1936
- United Chromium, Inc. v. Kohler Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1944
- United Chromium, Inc. v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947