Legal Opinion

United Chromium, Inc. v. Kohler Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 24, 1944No. 742PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, District Judge.

This is an action for the alleged infringement of two Fink patents relating to chromium plating. U. S. Pat. 1,581,188, hereafter called the “Bath Patent”, was granted April 20, 1926, on application filed December 19, 1925. U. S. Pat. 1,802,463, hereafter called the “Bright Plating Patent” was granted April 28, 1931, on application filed September 19, 1925.

The Bath Patent is for a “process of electro-depositing chromium and of preparing baths therefor.” Claims 4, 6, 10, 13, 16 and 18 are in issue. In June, 1928, claims 4, 6, 10 and 13 in suit were amended by a disclaimer,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Saranac Automatic MacHine Corp. v. Wirebounds Patents Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United Chromium, Inc. v. International Silver Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. United Chromium v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Chromium, Inc. v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API