Legal Opinion
Russ v. Van Scoyoc Associates, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 16, 2000No. CA 98-3151 (RCL)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Marnie Russ has filed suit against defendants Van Scoyoc Associates, Inc. and the President of Van Scoyoc Associates, H. Stewart Van Scoyoc, charging that she was sexually harassed, discriminated against on the basis of her gender, constructively discharged and retaliated against in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the D.C. Human Rights Act (DCHRA), D.C.Code § 1-2501 et seq. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all counts. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Baloch v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Burton v. BatistaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Hammel v. Marsh USA Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- McCain v. CCA of Tennessee, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Moore v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.