Legal Opinion
Grimm v. Baumgart
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 1951No. 18,083PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Royse, J.
In his petition for rehearing appellee says that deciding this case on the authority of International Shoe Company v. Lacy (1944), 114 Ind. App; 641, 53 N. E. 2d 636, we overlooked the very vital fact that the appellee herein gave valuable consideration for the contract or franchise.
In the International Shoe Company case, supra, this court in its opinion pointed out that one of the contentions of appellee was:
“That appellant promised her exclusive representation in Indianapolis if she would acquire funds for the purpose from the disposition of other property,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- International Shoe Co. v. LacyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Toni v. Kingan & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Grimm v. BaumgartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951