Legal Opinion

Astoria State Bank v. Markwood

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1917No. File No. 3799PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

This cause is before us upon rehearing, our former opinion being reported in 37 S. D. 56, 156 N. W. 583. Reference is -made thereto for a statement of the nature of the cause and the facts established by the evidence. It stands conceded that the defenants were not entitled to credit for the payment made by defendants to Windherst but unremitted to plaintiff, unless there was evidence sufficient to warrant the jury in finding that Windherst was either the actual or ostensible agent of plaintiff. The facts were undisputed, and, in our former op-in-*438ion, <we sustained the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reid v. KelloggSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McVay v. BridgmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Astoria State Bank v. MarkwoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Guaranty Securities Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. McCornick & Co. v. Gem State Oil & Products Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Kalen v. GeldermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Astoria State Bank v. MarkwoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Farmers' Live Stock Loan Co. v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API