Rynearson v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting judgment for defendants on the grounds of collateral estoppel. We reverse.
The cause of action arose from an accident allegedly caused by a defective tire of an automobile in which plaintiff was a passenger. Plaintiff and the representative of the driver’s estate, Steven Bevard, retained the same attorney who filed separate actions on their behalf against these defendants. Except for allegations pertaining to injuries the complaints were identical and charged the defendants with product liability. The depositions of the expert witnesses were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Gaul v. TourtellotteOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Waitkus v. PomeroyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Skoog v. County of ClackamasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Yorulmazoglu v. Lake Forest HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Baxter v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Daniel Skoog v. County of Clackamas Mark Fresh, and Herbert Royster, Daniel Skoog v. County of Clackamas Mark Fresh Herbert Royster, Daniel Skoog v. County of Clackamas, and Mark Fresh Herbert RoysterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.