Legal Opinion
Skoog v. County of Clackamas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 20, 2006No. 04-35087, 04-35286, 04-35568PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
This set of appeals arises from a single lawsuit that is still ongoing. The district court granted summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity to one of the defendants, Officer Herbert Royster, on all but one claim: the plaintiffs claim that Royster seized his still camera in retaliation for the exercise of his First Amendment rights. In 04-35087, Royster inter-locutorily appeals the court’s denial of summary judgment on that claim, and we reverse. Although the plaintiff stated a valid retaliation claim, the right assertedly violated — the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hartman v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Anthony C. Greene v. Jack Barber, Edward Hillyer, Victor Gillis, William Hegarty, and the City of Grand Rapids, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Nieves v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Neil O'Brien v. John WeltyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- McBeth v. HimesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Beck v. City of UplandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Dietrich v. John Ascuaga's NuggetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.