Legal Opinion
Wielgos v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 22, 1988No. 84 C 1222PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Stanley Wielgos (“Wielgos”), acting on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, sued Commonwealth Edison Company (“Edison”) and several underwriters (“Underwriter Defendants”) in this action for violations of Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”) § 11 (15 U.S.C. § 77k) (“Section 11”). This Court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment in the “Opinion,” 688 F.Supp. 331 (N.D.Ill.1988).
Now Edison has moved for sanctions in the form of attorneys’ fees and costs under one or more of Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 (“Rule 11”), 28 U.S.C. § 1927…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- In re TCI Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Lawrence B. Ordower v. Leonard Feldman, and Sinclair Global Brokerage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Brown v. Federation of State Medical BoardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- John A. Healey, Michael S. Press v. Chelsea Resources, Ltd., Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. And Dominick & Dominick, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Wielgos v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Wielgos v. Commonwealth Edison Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Kessler v. Superior Care, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Healey v. Chelsea Resources Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.