Legal Opinion
Healey v. Chelsea Resources Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 10, 1990No. 88 Civ. 6957 (RLC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
The underlying facts of this case are set forth in the court’s opinion of August 31, 1990, with which familiarity is assumed. Healey v. Chelsea Resources Ltd., 132 F.R.D. 346 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (Carter, J.).
Michael S. Press, plaintiff’s attorney at trial, has moved through his own attorney for enlargement of the record and reargument of the court’s decision to impose sanctions against him under Rule 11, F.R.Civ.P, and under § 11(e) of the Securities Act of 1933. 15 U.S.C. § 77k(e) (last sentence). Plaintiff John A. Healey has moved separately for reargument…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John A. Healey, Michael S. Press v. Chelsea Resources, Ltd., Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. And Dominick & Dominick, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Andrews v. BibleTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Good Timez, Inc. v. Phoenix Fire and Marine Ins. Co.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1991
- Capital Factors, Inc. v. Homeline Corp. (In Re General Plastics Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1995
- Monsieur Shawnellias Burgess v. Bradford Hills HOACourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2026