Legal Opinion

Canell v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 27, 2002No. 00C-13453; A114144PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Plaintiff filed a tort action against the state and a named correctional officer alleging various acts of negligence that, in effect, resulted in the misplacement of his eyeglasses when he was moved from one housing unit to another at the Oregon State Penitentiary. The trial court granted the state’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, which, on appeal, the state concedes was error. For the reasons described below, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

According to plaintiffs complaint, defendants “failed in their duty * * * by not following OAR 291-117-0060(7)”1 and not inventorying…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Grants Pass Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. George v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Ramirez v. Hawaii T & S Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Thompson v. Estate of Adrian L. PannellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spillino v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API