Legal Opinion
State v. Suber
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 2003No. 02AP-1419 (REGULAR CALENDAR)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Deshler, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Paul W. Súber, appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas after a bench trial in which appellant was found guilty of six counts of passing bad checks and one count of extortion.
{¶ 2} The charges against appellant arose from a series of transactions by which appellant sought to profit from the federal regulatory system, mandated by the Expedited Funds Availability Act of 1987 (“EFAA”), codified at Section 4001, Title 12, U.S.Code., et seq., under which banks are obligated to make funds…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. KeithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. LettOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Matter of K.B., Ca2006-03-077 (4-9-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. BeltOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. Smith, Unpublished Decision (1-10-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. BirinyiOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.