Legal Opinion

White v. Jones

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1865PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kane County; the Hon. Isaac Gr. Wilson, Judge, presiding. Harvey White instituted his action of replevin in the court below against John Jones, Justus D. Andrus and Ethan J. Allen, to recover the possession of a stock of goods. A trial resulted in a verdict for the defendants, and a writ of retorno habendo was awarded.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Walker

Appellant replevied a stock of goods from the sheriff, who had levied upon them under an execution against Waterman & Hall. There is no dispute that they were the owners of the goods up to the time that the claims of the appellant and the creditors originated. Appellant proved that about ten o’clock in the forenoon of the twentieth of November, 1860, he purchased and took possession of the stock of goods. It likewise appears that an execution-was issued on a judgment against Myron Y. Hall, and came into the hands of the sheriff at a quarter past nine o’clock of the same forenoon; and if that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waterman v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. The St. Louis & Sandoval Coal & Mining Co. v. Sandoval Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. First Nat. Bank v. NewtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  5. Branch v. WisemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API