Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Scroghan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 2004No. 03A01-0304-CV-00140PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Allstate Insurance Company appeals from the trial court's order requiring it to produce documents, which Allstate claims will cost approximately $12 million to produce. Tim Seroghan, the insured, argues that this Court does not have jurisdiction to hear the case. In response, Allstate claims this is an interlocutory appeal as of right under: (1) Indiana Appellate Rule 14(A)(1), pertaining to the payment of money; (2) Rule 14(A)8), dealing with orders compelling the production of certain documents; and (8) the holding of State v. Hogan, 582 N.E.2d 824…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Lugar v. State Ex Rel. LeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Claywell v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. HoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Nass v. State Ex Rel. Unity Team, Local 9212, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement WorkersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Bacon v. BaconIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. ScroghanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. v. MayberryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Johnson v. Estate of BrazillIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Daimler Chrysler Corp. v. YaegerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API