Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Estate of Brazill
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 11, 2009No. 29A02-0902-CV-126PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
The Hamilton Superior Court ordered attorney David A. Anderson and the law firm of Anderson & Associates, P.C. (collectively "Anderson" to pay attorney fees to the Estate of Timothy P. Brazill ("the Estate") and attorney Judy G. Hester ('Hester"), as a discovery sanction. Anderson now brings this interlocutory appeal and argues that the trial court's award of attorney fees to the Estate was improper and that Hester could not properly be awarded attorney fees because she was acting pro se. Concluding sua sponte that Anderson failed to timely bring this interlocutory…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. ScroghanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Smyth v. HesterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Hudson v. TysonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Young v. Estate of SweeneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Citizens Industrial Group v. Heartland Gas Pipeline, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Huber v. Montgomery County SheriffIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Kevin L. Snyder v. Anastasia SnyderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- David Wise v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- State of Indiana v. I.T.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- North Willow Operating LLC v. ClayIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.