Legal Opinion
Murray v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHofstader, J.
In 1922 the city of New York and the Jersey Coast Ferry Company, Inc., entered into an agreement under which the city leased to the ferry company a terminal to be thereafter constructed by it at Tottenville, Staten Island, together with the privilege or franchise to operate a ferry service between that point and South Amboy, N. J. On March 15, 1922, pursuant to the terms of this agreement, the company caused to be deposited with the comptroller of the city of New York $25,000 in stock as security for the faithful performance of the terms of the lease.
The city undertook to construct the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Port Richmond & Bergen Point Ferry Co. v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Wigand v. . Bachmann-Bechtel Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- DeForest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Triangle Radio Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Mayor of Vidalia v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bush Terminal Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murray v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Polley v. Plainsun Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957