Legal Opinion
Polley v. Plainsun Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.
Motion by all of the defendants but one for an order (1) striking paragraph Thirtieth and the second and third causes of action as sham and (2) dismissing each of the three causes of action alleged in the complaint for insufficiency. The moving defendants will hereinafter be referred to as the “ defendants ”.
In the first cause of action, which is attacked solely for insufficiency, plaintiffs allege that they are licensed real estate brokers, that the individual defendants own all or most of the capital stock of the two corporate defendants, that in March, 1954 one of the defendants, on behalf…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Stern v. Gepo Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Wilson & English Construction Co. v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Shore Bridge Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
- Sidella Export-Import Corp. v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oil Trading Associates, Inc. v. Texas City Refining, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962