Legal Opinion

Lawhorn v. Joseph Toyota, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 2001No. C.A. Case Nos. 18282 18306, T.C. Case No. 99-1796/99-4302/99-4307PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from a summary judgment rendered against them on their claims against defendant-appellee, Joseph Toyota, Inc. They contend that the trial court erred by granting the summary judgment motion filed by Joseph Toyota. We agree. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.

I

This case was originally filed in the trial court as three separate class action complaints against Joseph Toyota. The named plaintiffs were Randall A. Law-horn, Martha Thomas, and Kathleen G. Newton. Each named plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Gibbons-Grable Co. v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hine v. Byler, 07ca2961 (1-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Urso v. Compact Cars, 2006-T-0062 (8-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Hunter v. Rhino ShieldDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
  4. Hunter v. Rhino ShieldDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  5. Martin v. Kings Ford, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API