Lawhorn v. Joseph Toyota, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from a summary judgment rendered against them on their claims against defendant-appellee, Joseph Toyota, Inc. They contend that the trial court erred by granting the summary judgment motion filed by Joseph Toyota. We agree. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.
I
This case was originally filed in the trial court as three separate class action complaints against Joseph Toyota. The named plaintiffs were Randall A. Law-horn, Martha Thomas, and Kathleen G. Newton. Each named plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Gibbons-Grable Co. v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hine v. Byler, 07ca2961 (1-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Urso v. Compact Cars, 2006-T-0062 (8-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hunter v. Rhino ShieldDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Hunter v. Rhino ShieldDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Martin v. Kings Ford, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015