Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Rhino Shield

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 20, 2021No. 2:18-cv-01097Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION RUTH A. HUNTER, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:18-cv-1097 v. JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers RHINO SHIELD, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants Rhino Shield, James Williams, Steven Dominique, Tri-State Coating, Inc., AmCoat Industries, Inc., Rudolph Pallone, John Robertson, and AmCoat Technologies, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J., ECF No. 189); Plaintiffs Ruth Hunter and Mark Hunter’s Four…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API