Consolidated Box Co. v. Penn
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.
This case was tried before the court without a jury. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived by all parties.
Plaintiff, Consolidated Box Company, hereinafter called “Consolidated” sued defendant, Isadore Penn, hereinafter called “Penn” for $3,500, the purchase price of a nailing machine.
Penn brought a third-party action against Isadore Pedowitz, a trucker, hereinafter called “ Pedowitz ”, for negligently breaking the nailing machine while transporting it.
On September 13, 1951 Consolidated and Penn entered into a sales agreement, the legal purport of which, as I interpret it, was a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hartshorn v. . ChaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hamilton v. . McPhersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Den Norske Ameriekalinje Actiesselskabet v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Flamm v. NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Leonard v. New York, Albany & Buffalo Electro Magnetic Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nargi v. Parking Associates Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1962
- Mullen v. JacobsNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Rosenfield v. ChoberkaNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Oneida County v. DiCastroNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Oneida County v. DiCastroNew York Supreme Court, Oneida County · 2004