Legal Opinion

Consolidated Box Co. v. Penn

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 18, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.

This case was tried before the court without a jury. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived by all parties.

Plaintiff, Consolidated Box Company, hereinafter called “Consolidated” sued defendant, Isadore Penn, hereinafter called “Penn” for $3,500, the purchase price of a nailing machine.

Penn brought a third-party action against Isadore Pedowitz, a trucker, hereinafter called “ Pedowitz ”, for negligently breaking the nailing machine while transporting it.

On September 13, 1951 Consolidated and Penn entered into a sales agreement, the legal purport of which, as I interpret it, was a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hartshorn v. . ChaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Hamilton v. . McPhersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Den Norske Ameriekalinje Actiesselskabet v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Flamm v. NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Leonard v. New York, Albany & Buffalo Electro Magnetic Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nargi v. Parking Associates Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1962
  2. Mullen v. JacobsNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Rosenfield v. ChoberkaNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Oneida County v. DiCastroNew York Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Oneida County v. DiCastroNew York Supreme Court, Oneida County · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API