Legal Opinion
Rosenfield v. Choberka
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert E. Fischer, J.
Plaintiff paid approximately $14,000 for a new car in December of 1986, which was substantially damaged a few weeks later solely as a result of the negligence of the defendant. Plaintiff now brings her action for property damages urging that she should receive an award of damages sufficient to make her whole, even though such an award may include the loss in market value of her car in addition to the cost of repair.
*10The facts are not in dispute. After the collision, the plaintiff went to the dealer from which she had purchased the car to trade the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hartshorn v. . ChaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Steitz v. GiffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Gass v. Agate Ice Cream, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Ward v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Parilli v. Brooklyn City RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Papenheim v. LovellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- City of Atlanta v. BroadnaxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Willett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
- Delamater v. FisherAlbany City Court · 2015