Legal Opinion

Lang v. Reetz-Lang

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1985No. 84AP-02Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormac, J.

In this cause, the court is presented with the issues of whether, under R.C. 3105.31(F) and 3105.32(F), a party seeking annulment must demonstrate fault on the part of the defendant, and whether promises contained in an antenuptial agreement, which agreement omits to provide that subsequent nonconsummation of the marriage would void the agreement or render it unenforceable, are extinguished by nonconsummation under Gross v. Gross (1984), 11 Ohio St. 3d 99.

On June 23,1982, Lynn Reetz-Lang, defendant-appellant, and Earl Lang, plaintiff-appellee, entered into an antenuptial agreement which…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gross v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Darling v. DarlingOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Rudrick v. ThullOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Anderson v. AndersonTuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API