Legal Opinion

Rudrick v. Thull

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff in error, John Rudrick, administrator of the estate of Mary Mohler, who was the plaintiff below, filed his petition in the common pleas court of Richland county against the defendant in error, Eva K. Thull, administratrix of the estate of John Mohler, who was the defendant below. The petition recites the representative capacity of the plaintiff in error and defendant in error, and avers that the two decedents, during their lifetimes, and prior to their marriage, entered into an antenuptial contract, a copy of which is as follows:

“Marriage Contract.
“This Agreement made and concluded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth Magniac v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Prewit v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Deller v. DellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Barlow's Admr. v. Comstock's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lang v. Reetz-LangOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Lang v. Reetz-LangOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API