Legal Opinion

Baader v. Mascellino

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 17, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"He who asks equity must do equity." On the proper application of this maxim depends the outcome of the suit. Complainant, a judgment creditor, asks the court to aid in the collection of his judgment by setting aside fraudulent conveyances made by the debtor, Antonio Mascellino.

Complainant held a bond and mortgage made by Mascellino in the principal sum of $9,100. He foreclosed, obtained a decree for principal, interest and costs amounting to $10,175 and at the sheriff's sale, bought in the mortgaged property May 6th, 1931, for $100. Three months later, he recovered in the circuit court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Lansing v. GoeletCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
  3. Bourgeois v. Risley Real Estate Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  4. Fifth Ave. Bank of N.Y. v. CompsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. Minzesheimer v. DoolittleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. 79-83 Thirteenth Ave., Ltd. v. DeMarcoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. Miller v. Bond Mortgage Guaranty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. Fidelity Union Tr. v. Multiple RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  4. Patsourakos v. KolioutosNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  5. Fidelity Realty Co. v. Fidelity Corp. of N.J.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API